|
WHEN
WILL I EVER LEARN?
Time
to stop consulting in the teachers' lounge?
Donald
J. Asbridge, KOG Editor
Recent conversation
[i.e., consultation] in the teachers' lounge...
Teacher: “I
know the IEP team has been testing John. As you know, I was the one
who referred him to see if he has a learning disability. I'm just
wondering, does it look like he'll qualify?”
Psychologist:
“I don't know yet...”
Teacher: “I
studied a little about learning disabilities in college, I'm glad we're
having this chance to talk -- I have a few questions that maybe you can
help me with. I know learning disabled students have a chemical imbalance
- they can't think right… and medications usually help. Am I correct?”
Psychologist:
“No, that's not exactly right… they don't have a chemical imbalance, or
if they do, that's for a physician to determine. And meds aren't
usually prescribed for LD, or if they are, that decision is between the
parent and physician. And students with learning disabilities think
just as capably as any other student.”
Teacher: “Well,
maybe you can help me better understand. What is a learning disability?”
Psychologist:
“I don't know. No one really knows.”
Teacher: “I
don't understand, how long have you been a psychologist?”
Psychologist:
“About twenty years.”
Teacher: “How
is it you can spend twenty years testing students for learning disabilities,
but you don't know what a learning disability is?”
Psychologist:
“That's a great question.”
Teacher: “Why
do you keep doing it?”
Psychologist:
“Because that's what we do.” *
Teacher: “Gee,
please don't take this wrong, but I hope you'll read the research so the
students here at school can get better services. I would certainly
want the school psychologist to know what a learning disability is… you
are supposed to be the expert, right? Don't you think I'm correct?”
Psychologist:
“Hmmm. That's the problem. I have read the research...
but the kids are the true experts.”
Teacher: “I
don't get it. Certainly my student has a learning disability and
I'm hoping you're able to recognize that with all the tests you've been
giving him. He needs the services - he just can't complete his homework.”
Psychologist:
“I don't give tests any more - they've all been taken away.”
Teacher: “Now
I'm not only confused, but I'm getting angry too. How many students
have you tested in your, uh, career and identified as learning disabled?”
Psychologist:
“Hundreds… no, probably a thousand or two.”
Teacher: “Wow!
Okay, I'm getting it now... I think you're teasing me because I'm a rookie
teacher. I'm sorry if I sounded too assertive or aggressive.
I'm just trying to get services for my student. You really do know
what a learning disability is, don't you? You were just playing Devil's
Advocate to try to get me to think, right? I've heard that's what
you do sometimes.”
Psychologist:
“No, I wish I was. I really don't know what a learning disability
is… as far as I can tell, learning disabled students are the same as non
learning disabled kids.”
Teacher: “Then
why do you keep identifying them as learning disabled?”
Psychologist:
“Because that's what we do.”
Teacher: “Maybe
the school could hire a psychologist or speaker or expert or someone who
could
come in and give an inservice to explain to all of us what a learning disability
is. We could learn together as an entire staff! That might
help. I'm just trying to think of a positive idea or solution!”
Psychologist:
“I've been listening to psychologists and other experts try to explain
what a learning disability is for over twenty years. Sorry to be
the one to tell you this, but they don't know either.”
Teacher: “I'm
appalled, I'm appalled at your lack of professionalism. I'm just
trying to understand learning disabilities and you just can't seem to help
me. And you don't seem to even be trying.”
Psychologist:
“All right then, here's my definition of students who get diagnosed with
a learning disability. Students who get identified as learning disabled
are the students who don't attend school, don't like school, have low motivation,
have a bad attitude, get in trouble a lot, don't like their teacher, are
experimenting with drugs, are in a gang, or speak another language.
Usually they are male or some other minority. Sometimes they are
the students who are just trying to cope with a difficult life situation,
like a divorce or the death of a loved one. Sometimes they are the
students who just aren't that great at spelling. Usually they are
the students whose teacher just wants out of the class. Almost always
they are the students who don't do their homework. Almost always
IEP teams get together and call the student learning disabled just trying
to "help," but often the well-meaning teams forget that, "to help is not
always to help." Those are the students who get diagnosed with a
learning disability.
Teacher: “But
that could be any of them!”
Psychologist:
“Now you're getting it.”
Teacher: “This
all sounds like a farce to me. I've never been treated this way in
my professional career. I think you should just quit playing this
game and quit calling students learning disabled if you don't even know
what one is and you have no tests or instruments to even test for it.”
Psychologist:
“I agree.”
Teacher: “I'm
outta' here - I just don't know what you're trying to do. One final
question -- are you going to get John out of my class or not? He's
hurting my test scores and I need him out now. It's obvious to all
the other third grade teachers he has a learning disability."
Psychologist:
“Then I don't think you have a thing to worry about... if all the third
grade teachers regard him as having a condition, then he can at least get
his civil rights protected through Section 504. I hope you have a
great afternoon and I'll see you at the meeting!"
*Behaviorist's
creed: "We are what we do."
I'M
CALLING OUT ALASKA!
Is
it time to make our move?
Donald
J. Asbridge, KOG Editor
As per rankings
by morganquitno.com,
California is ranked 47th.* Any ideas how we can move up to the coveted
46th spot?
I don't get it.
I don't understand why California education is still ranked 47th.
We show up to work
every day to serve students.
Just like all the other states.
We test students
and label them and put them in special classes.
Just like all the other states.
We take fifteen
or so days a year to administer nationally standardized tests.
Just like all the other states.
We do what the United
States Department of Education tells us do.
Just like all the other states.
We do what the State
Department of Education tells us do.
Just like all the other states.
We do what the County
Office of Education tells us do.
Just like all the other counties.
We serve all students
even though there are over a hundred different languages.
Just like all the other states.
We serve students
no matter what their legal immigration status.
Just like most states.
We provide anti-bullying
and anger management programs.
Just like all the other states.
We provide peer
mediation and conflict resolution programs.
Just like all the other states.
We provide threat
assessments and crisis intervention services.
Just like all the other states.
We hire family
members, relatives, and good friends to fill key positions.
Just like all the other states.
We bring in experts
and consultants and speakers.
Just like all the other states.
We change everything
we do every year by starting new research based programs.
Just like all the other states.
We keep graduating
students from high school.
Just like nine other states.
We order enough materials
and tests to fund corporations.
Just like all the other states.
Most of our teachers
are highly qualified as per NCLB.
Just like all the other states.
We put primary emphasis
on legal compliance in every educational decision.
Just like all the other states.
We don't make a
move until we've consulted with our lawyers.
Just like all the other states.
We perform hours
of red tape and bureaucratic paperwork activities daily.
Just like all the other states.
We force behavioral
compliance through "discipline" onto our students.
Just like all the other states.
At every level we
are administration-heavy with many always directing us.
Just like all the other states.
Our unions insure
an outstanding environmental setting for all [employees].
Just like all the other states.
We deal with gangsters
and substance abuse and truancy daily.
Just like all the other states.
We fail
enough males to populate the military and the prisons.
Just like all the other states.
We ritualistically
administer plenty of homework
every night
Just like the rest of 'em.
We retain children
by the thousands every year.
Just like all the other states.
Our politicians
and school board members micromanage
our every move.
Just like all the other states.
Our secretaries
run the schools.
Just like all the other states.
By extensive
use of meds, we insure a prosperous pharmaceutical industry.
Just like all the other states.
Our leadership has
a, a vision of education.
Just, um, like all the other states.
We have some teachers
with great classroom management skills.
Just like all the other states.
If our students
aren't going to graduate, they go to "alternative" schools.
Just like Texas.
The civil rights
of students are protected through Section 504.
Just like all the other states.
SLD and autism are
increasingly identified.
Just like most of the other states.
About 60% of students
and teachers work cooperatively toward a goal.
Just like all the other states.
We have a curriculum.
Just like all the other states.
The state
standards are taught at grade level every day.
Just like all the other states.
We are experiencing
educational
reform on a statewide basis?
Just like all the other states.
So I just don't get
it. I just don't understand how California can still be ranked #47.
It's getting kind
of embarrassing.
What else can we
do? (I have a few ideas)
Anyone have any
ideas on how we can move up to #46?
I'm calling out
Alaska... time for a showdown!
*Fourth graders proficient or better in reading in 2005.
KASP
MEMBERSHIP INFO...
Do
you want to become a KASP member?
If so, contact Traci
Taber Rivas directly at: rivast@gfusd.k12.ca.us
|
|
|
Dear KOG Editor,
Why wasn't there a February KOG?
Signed, "Dejected Reader"
Dear Dejected Reader,
Because
nothing was happening in January.
Signed, KOG Editor
Dear KOG Editor,
Okay Mr. Big Shot KOG Editor, just tell me this. How can you legally
diagnose SLD without giving tests and without sitting down and writing
a lengthy and legally compliant report? What makes you so special?
Go ahead, just try to answer that one!"
Signed, "I Dare You To Try To Answer This"
Dear IDYTTTAT,
You're
half right. You can't legally diagnose a learning disability without
complying with the myriad of rules, regulations, and laws. But, you
can't ethically diagnose a learning disability under the present rules,
regulations, and laws. Therein lies the dilemma.
Signed, KOG Editor
Dear KOG Editor,
What kind of leadership and vision would you expect at a county level?
Signed, "New Vision"
Dear New Vision,
I would
expect the same as at the state and national levels, but I would of course,
hope for a whole lot more.
Signed, KOG Editor
Dear KOG Editor,
You got me thinking. I'm starting to wonder about this whole learning
disability thing. It might be some kind of a complex charade.
How did it all start and where could I get more information?
Signed, "School Counselor"
Dear School Counselor,
I'm
glad you're thinking about this important topic. A bunch of well-meaning
people got together about thirty or forty years ago and invented
learning disabilities. Their original good ideas and noble goals
have unfortunately eroded over time into the system in which we now find
ourselves. There are many sources of information available, but you
might want to start
here.
Signed, KOG Editor
|
Dear
KOG Editor,
Why don't you ever include contributions from others?
Signed, "Monitor"
Dear Monitor,
Because
no one ever contributes anything.
Signed, KOG Editor
Dear KOG Editor,
I just wanted to thank you for helping me turn around my life last year.
Signed, "Ex-Student"
Dear Ex-Student,
It
was my privilege working with you. I commend you for the great choices
you are making in your life.
Signed, KOG Editor
Dear KOG Editor,
School psychology -- love it or leave it!
Signed, "A True School Psychologist"
Dear ATSP,
I do
love school psychology as a profession... that's why I keep courageously
speaking up, fighting for more effective practices, and trying to make
what we do even, um, better for students.
Signed, KOG Editor
Dear KOG Editor,
What do you really think about school psychologists?
Signed, "Anonymous"
Dear Anonymous,
School
psychologists provide powerful and positive services for students on a
daily basis throughout the entire United States. I am proud to be
a school psychologist.
Signed, KOG Editor
NOTES
& DISCLAIMERS:
Any
opinions expressed in the KOG are opinions only and are not necessarily
approved or supported by the KASP organization or anyone else, including
the KOG Editor. On the other hand, any facts expressed or implied
are indeed, facts. Just as is true for everything else in this world,
you get to decide what is opinion, what is fact, and what is research based,
and if and how they may or may not all go together. Please note that
just because something is research based doesn't necessarily make it a
fact; and not all facts are research based. Some opinions are
facts and research based. Some opinions are not facts, yet are still
research based. Just because something is research based doesn't
necessarily make it a fact, or ethical. Some facts are facts for
some but not facts for others; the same concept holds true for opinions
and research. The same can be said for humor, satire, parody, and
serious notes. Some opinions are just opinions. However, one
thing is always certain...
...everything is.
See you next
month! KOG Editor!
|
AN
ONGOING SERVICE FOR YOU
Labeling
Links...
Donald J. Asbridge,
Ed.S., KOG Editor
As an ongoing
service for you, the KOG will accumulate links related to RWOL and the
intense debate about SLD and labeling. If you find any other great
links relating to these topics, please forward them for inclusion here
to the KOG Editor at shrink@igalaxy.net
March's
Links...
Okay, don't
listen to me -- I understand. But will you listen to Kevin P. Dwyer,
Past NASP President and recipient of the NASP Lifetime Achievement Award?
"Rights Without Labels:"
Words or Actions?... http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/pdf/cqNov06.pdf
by Kevin P. Dwyer,
NCSP, Past NASP President and recipient of the NASP Lifetime Achievement
Award, in the November, 2006 NASP Communique' (page 36): "Rights
Without Labels cannot be just a position paper. It must be a living,
working, ethical document shaping the practice of school psychology...
Together, nationally, and in each state and community, we need permanent
structures to evaluate ourselves and our work to ensure improved outcomes
for all... We have a national crisis... Who among us will move to
instituting 'Rights Without Labels'?"
The Diagnosis Debate
from Parenting magazine... http://www.parenting.com/parenting/child/article/0,19840,647077,00.html
By Perri Klass,
M.D., in 1998. This question has been the elephant in the room for
quite awhile.
About Learning Disabilities...
http://www.childdevelopmentinfo.com/learning/learning_disabilities.shtml
As per the Child
Development Institute, "Interestingly, there is no clear and widely
accepted definition of 'learning disabilities'."
College student's
position paper... http://www.bsu.edu/web/jccassady/393web/students/mcdonald.htm
"Supporters of [this]
theory believe... that there really is no such thing as a learning disability."
Controversy about LD: "The definition of learning disabilities remains
very vague. Historically, there has been more emphasis on correcting
learning disabilities than there has been on really understanding them
(Forness, 2). This lack of definition makes it very hard to diagnose
learning disabilities because people have different ideas of what a learning
disability looks like. Also, the accuracy of the testing procedures
is often questioned (Seternberg, 171)."
There is no such
thing as a Learning Disability... http://www.serendip.brynmawr.edu/local/dd/dd98/Disability.html
I'm not certain
exactly what this is, except Dolores Millender is also asking the question.
Havidol -- internet
parody... http://www.havidol.com
I don't like to
be laughed at. Is the whole world laughing at us?
Past
Links...
College coursework...
http://www.unm.edu/~bricheer/sgch1-5.htm
Disabilities fall
on the normal curve... http://www.disabilityisnatural.com/articles/index.htm
NASP has an official
position statement at: http://www.nasponline.org/about_nasp/pospaper_rwl.aspx
Just about every
KOG has related items... http://www.kernschoolpsych.org/kog.htm
THE
KOG's MARCH BONUS SECTION
Is
this something to think [more] about?
Donald J. Asbridge,
Ed.S., KOG Editor
Nothing
up my sleeve...
A brief, basic phenomenological**
comparison of three of the major models of service delivery models (there
are more):
|
Service
Delivery Model:
|
Traditional/Medical/Cognitive |
RtI/3-Tier/Behavioral |
RWOL/Humanistic/
Reciprocal-Determinism |
|
Educational
Goal:
|
Treat
the Disease |
Improve
the behavior |
Empowerment/self-responsibility |
|
Basic
Assumptions:
|
Something
is wrong with the student |
Something
is wrong with the behavior |
The
student is heroic, capable, and noble |
|
Methodology:
|
Instantly
diagnose SLD |
Eventually
diagnose SLD |
Diagnose
educational needs |
|
Instrumentation:
|
IQ
and processing tests |
Record
behavior w/pencil and paper |
Listen
to the student; use your brain |
|
Treatment:
|
Isolation,
exclusion, quarantine, decontamination |
Reinforcement,
punishment, change environment |
Quality
education, respect and dignity |
|
Supports:
|
Provide
medications and therapy |
Provide
treats and behavior plans |
Provide
hope, optimism, and success |
|
Responsible
Party/Expert:
|
The
psychologist |
The
BICM |
The
student |
The present debate
in our field seems to always center on traditional vs. behavioral approaches.
Remember your basic training in psychology -- there are other schools
of thought. Remember?
After 30+ years of
cognitivism and 12+ years of behaviorism, California remains in, um, 47th
place and special education still doesn't work.
More students
-- not less -- are being labeled. That statistic says a lot.
How much longer do
the behaviorists need to try implement their, um, new RtI philosophy?
Do we need another thirty years of this? I wish the behaviorists
would have thought some of this through before they legislated/mandated
their philosophy in the 1995 reauthorization of IDEA.
And the cognitivists
-- they tried, I'll give them credit for that.
Maybe it's time to
consider finding something that might actually work [better] for
students? I think school psychologists could be heroic leaders
in education if we chose to empower rather than disable students.
Americans want
bold and effective changes now.
Nationwide polls
tell us most Americans want Congress to quit playing partisan "games" and
just do what's best for the country (I'm not trying to be political just
trying to find a great transition into my next thought). Similarly,
education is consistently ranked as one of the top three concerns of Americans.
Maybe American citizens want us to quit playing our partisan "games" too
and just provide a quality education for all of their children? I
know that's all I'm asking as a parent, professional, and taxpayer. I
know you want to provide a quality educaton for all students too... that's
the factor with which we all agree.
What do you think?
I think there are plenty who are ready for positive -- AND SIGNIFICANT
--changes. I'm not the only one who has these thoughts.
"People
say I'm crazy."
John Lennon
It's time for RWOL
NOW!!!
Although there exists
some variance per locale, approximately seven percent of students are diagnosed
with LD.
Seven percent
of the population is significant.
People say I'm
the radical one?
I say it's pretty
radical to give a test and say a kid has a brain disorder.
I say it's pretty
radical to follow a kid around and give him M&M's every time
he pays attention in class.
Who's the radical
one?
People say I'm
crazy?
People say it will
be twenty years before we quit disabling students.
I say it's pretty
crazy to keep doing the same thing every day, even though we know it
doesn't work!
Who's the crazy
one?
What do you say?
Is this something to think [more] about?
**Phenomenological
means this chart is based on my perceptions of reality. Don't worry,
I'm not pretending any information contained in the chart is an accurate
reflection of your phenomenology. You are always welcome and invited
to share your perceptions in the KOG.
  
ANNOUNCEMENT:
SOMETHING SPECTACULAR IS COMING...
A SPECIAL EDITION
OF THE KOG WILL BE PUBLISHED ON MARCH 10TH, 2007
KOG
Home Page
March
KOG published: Wednesday, February 28th, 2007
www.kernschoolpsych.org/markog22.htm
The
KOG © 2002, 2003, 2005-12. KASP, Kern County, California
USA. Some rights reserved.

|